 |
| |
|
Changes in the size
and structure of national economies and
the effects of these changes on
|
|
the
global economy are the topic of the
tables in this section. The indicators
in this section include measures of
macroeconomic performance (GDP,
consumption, investment, and
international trade) and of stability
(central government budgets, prices, the
money supply, the balance of payments,
and external debt). Other important
economic indicators appear throughout
the book, especially in the States and
markets section (credit, investment,
financial markets, tax policies,
exchange rates) and the Global links
section (trade and tariffs, foreign
investment, and aid flows).
Economy recovery continues
Stronger performance by high-income
economies in 2003 helped the world
economy continue its recovery. The world
economy grew 2.8 percent, an increase of
1 percentage point over 2002 but below
the peak of 4 percent in 2000. The
world’s recorded output—and income—grew
by almost $4 trillion in nominal terms.
The low-income economies, boosted by an
unprecedented 8.6 percent growth in
India, registered the fastest growth,
followed by lower middle-income
economies. The upper middle-income
economies grew by 3.3 percent, reversing
the previous year’s negative growth
trend. The better performance was due to
above-average growth in Argentina,
Latvia, Lithuania, Malaysia, Poland, and
Saudi Arabia. High-income economies grew
by 2.2 percent (figure 4a).
|
| |
|
|
|
Long-term growth
trends
Economic growth in the past decade
was fastest in the developing economies
of East Asia and Pacific (averaging 6.7
percent a year) and South Asia (5.5
percent). Leading this growth were China
and India, each accounting for more than
70 percent of its region’s output. The
two regions continued to do well in
2003, with East Asia registering 8.1
percent growth and South Asia recording
7.5 percent growth.
The transition economies of Europe and
Central Asia continued their strong
recovery, growing at an impressive 5.8
percent in 2003, after an average of 3.3
percent in 2000–02. Several countries of
the former Soviet Union—such as Armenia,
Azerbaijan, Tajikistan, and
Turkmenistan—registered growth of more
than 10 percent, buoyed by increased
exports of natural gas and petroleum
products. Russia also did well with
growth of 7.3 percent in 2003, an
increase from 4.7 percent in 2002, but
still below the 10 percent in 2000.
In Latin America and the Caribbean and
the Middle East and North Africa growth
was faster in the 1990s than in the
1980s. But growth in Latin America
decelerated sharply in 2001 and turned
negative in 2002. The economies of
Argentina, Uruguay, and Venezuela
experienced large negative growth in
2002, while growth decelerated in Brazil
and Mexico in 2001 and 2002. Better
performance in 2003 by Argentina,
Mexico, and Uruguay resulted in positive
growth for the region, although
growth in Brazil turned negative, and
Venezuela, yet to recover, saw its GDP
fall by 9.4 percent. The Middle East and
North Africa region saw its growth rate
more than double over 2002, due to about
7 percent growth in Algeria, Iran, and
Saudi Arabia. The heavily indebted poor
countries, many in Sub-Saharan Africa,
registered 4.2 percent growth in 2003.
Nigeria (10.7 percent) and Sudan
(6 percent) had above average
performance. As a result, Sub-Saharan
Africa continued to improve its
performance over earlier periods, with
3.9 percent growth.
With two decades of high growth, the total GDP of East Asia and Pacific
nearly reached that of Latin America and
the Caribbean (figure 4b). By contrast
GDP in the Europe and Central Asia
region, almost equal to that of East
Asia and Pacific in 1992, is now only
half the GDP of East Asia and Pacific
after a decade of stagnant economic
performance. With steady growth, South
Asia’s GDP has almost caught up with
that of the Middle East and North
Africa, but GDP per capita lags far
behind in this populous region.
| |
|
Growth paths
Most developing economies are
following familiar growth paths, with
agriculture giving way first to
manufacturing and later to services as
the main source of income. But some,
such as Jordan and Panama, have moved
directly from agriculture to
service-based economies. For most
economies services have been the fastest
growing sector. In 1990–2003 the service
sector grew by 3.8 percent a year in
developing and transition economies and
by 3.1 percent in high-income economies. Among developing
regions South Asia had the fastest
growth in services in the 1990s, at
7 percent a year, and Europe and Central
Asia the slowest, at 1.7 percent
(table 4.1). |
|
|
|
4a |
|
Economic growth
varies greatly across regions |
| |
|
 |
|
Source: World Bank data
files. |
 |
|
|
|

|
|
|
|
4b |
|
With more than
two decades of rapid growth East
Asia and Pacific
has caught up with Latin America and
the Caribbean |
| |
|
 |
|
Source: World Bank data
files. |
 |
|
|
|

|
|
|
|
Services in developing economies
generated slightly more than half of GDP
in 2003, compared with 71 percent in
high-income economies (table 4.2). But
in East Asia and Pacific services
produced only 36 percent of GDP, and
from 1990 to 2003 growth in
manufacturing, at 10 percent a year,
outpaced growth in services, at 6.8
percent. This trend reflects the rapid
growth of manufacturing in China (11.7
percent a year), which also had rapid
expansion in services (8.8 percent a
year). |
|
|
|
The contribution of trade
Global trade (exports plus imports)
grew by 6.3 percent in 2003, recovering
from the low 3.6 percent in 2002. Trade
in high-income economies, which account
for more than 75 percent of global
trade, grew by only 2.3 percent in 2002,
after recovering from the decline in
2001. But trade in the low-income
economies increased by 12.3 percent in
2003, and in the middle-income economies
by 11.2 percent.
Trade in
merchandise—primary commodities and
manufactured goods— continues to
dominate. In 2003 merchandise accounted
for 81 percent of all exports of goods
and commercial services, and
manufactured goods for 77 percent of
merchandise exports (tables 4.5 and
4.7). Exporters of primary nonfuel
commodities saw their trade volumes
increase, but a continuing decline in
their terms of trade left them with less
income (table 4.4). The economies of
Sub-Saharan Africa were hit particularly
hard.
The structure of trade in services is
also changing. Transport services are
being replaced in importance by travel,
insurance and financial services, and
computer, information, and other
services. In the 1990s high-income
countries were the main exporters of
financial services. Now, many developing
countries are emerging as exporters of
these new services along with computer,
information, and business services
(table 4.7).
With expanding trade, and favorable current account balances, some
exporting countries are accumulating
large international reserves. The large
trade deficit of the United States ($531
billion) and the efforts by many Asian
exporters with large current account
surpluses to prevent their currencies
from appreciating against the dollar
have resulted in large accumulations of
international reserves in Asia. Workers’
remittances, growing steadily in
countries like India, also contributed
to favorable current account balances
and higher reserves. India has the
seventh largest reserves, ahead of most
high-income countries. Japan has the
largest reserves, followed by China. Of
the 10 economies with the largest
reserves, seven are in Asia (table 4.15
and table 4c).
|
| |
|
4c |
|
The 10
largest holders of foreign exchange
reserves in 2003 |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
$millions |
Months of imports |
|
Japan |
673,554
|
17 |
| China 416,199
|
416,199 |
11 |
|
Taiwan, China |
212,315 |
17 |
| United States
|
184,024 |
1 |
|
Korea, Rep. |
155,472 |
8 |
| Hong Kong, China
|
118,388 |
5 |
|
India |
103,737 |
12 |
| Germany |
96,835 |
1 |
|
Singapore |
95,746 |
7 |
| Russian
Federation |
78,409 |
7 |
|
|
|
Source:
World Bank and IMF data files. |
 |
|
|
|

|
|
Steady trends in
consumption, investment, and saving
Most of the world’s output goes to
final consumption by households
(including individuals) and governments.
The share of final consumption in world
output has remained fairly constant over
time, averaging about 80 percent in
1990–2003 (table 4.9). Growth of per
capita household consumption expenditure
provides an important indicator of the
potential for reducing poverty. In
1990–2003 per capita consumption grew by
5.7 percent a year in East Asia and
Pacific but by only 0.2 percent in
Sub-Saharan Africa,1.7 percent in Europe
and Central Asia, and 2.7 percent in
South Asia (table 4.10).
Output that is not consumed goes to
exports (less imports) and gross capital
formation (investment). Investment is
financed out of domestic and foreign
savings. High-income countries consume a
larger share of their output than do
developing countries. So, some
high-income countries, like the United
States and United Kingdom, with low
savings rates have to rely more on
foreign savings to finance their
investment.
In 2003 the global savings rate averaged 21 percent of total output. But
global averages disguise large
differences between countries. Savings
rates are consistently lower in
Sub-Saharan Africa. And they tend to be
volatile in countries dependent on
commodity exports. Gross domestic
savings in the Middle East and North
Africa rose from 20 percent of GDP in
1990 to 32 percent in 2003, buoyed by
higher oil prices. The highest savings
rate was in East Asia and Pacific, where
gross domestic savings averaged above 35
percent during most of the past decade
and reached 41 percent in 2003 (table
4.9).
Between 1990 and 2003 the rate of gross capital formation increased by
about 7.9 percent a year in East Asia
and Pacific and 6.4 percent in South
Asia, but declined by 4 percent in
Europe and Central Asia. East Asia and
Pacific continued to have the highest
investment rate in the world, at 38
percent of GDP in 2003. By contrast,
investment averaged only 19 percent of
GDP in Sub-Saharan Africa. Developing
countries invested a larger proportion
of their GDP (25 percent) than did
high-income countries, which as a group
saved and invested only about 20 percent
of GDP (tables 4.9 and 4.10). |
|
|
|
Greater monetary and fiscal stability
Governments, because of their size,
have a large effect on economic
performance. High taxes and subsidies
can distort economic behavior; when
governments finance large fiscal
deficits by growth of the money supply,
the likelihood of inflation increases.
As governments have adopted policies
leading to greater fiscal stability,
inflation rates and interest rates have
tended to decline. In 2003, 32 countries
had double-digit inflation measured by
the GDP deflator, down from nearly 50 in
2000 when the highest inflation rate was
516 percent (Democratic Republic of
Congo, table 4.14 and table 4d).
The central governments of developing countries have had larger cash
deficits than have high-income
countries. Central governments of South
Asian economies had expenses averaging
16 percent of GDP in 2003 and revenues
(mainly from taxes on goods and
services) averaging 12 percent of GDP,
leaving a cash deficit of about 4
percent of GDP after taking grants into
account (table 4.11).
Government expenses are mostly for the
purchase of goods and services
(including the wages and salaries of
public employees) and for subsidies and
current transfers to private and public
enterprises and local governments. The
rest go to interest payments and other
expenses. In 2003 subsidies and other
transfers accounted for 61 percent of
government spending in high-income
economies and 55 percent in Europe and
Central Asia, but only 11 percent in the
Middle East and North Africa (table
4.12).
|
|
|
|
4d |
|
Fewer
countries had double digit inflation
rates in 2003 |
|
Countries with more than 10 percent
inflation in 2003 (%) |
| |
|
Country |
|
Inflation
rate |
|
Angola |
|
92 |
|
Venezuela, RB |
|
37 |
|
Gambia, The |
|
31 |
| Belarus
|
|
29 |
|
Ghana |
|
29 |
| Dominican
Republic |
|
27 |
|
Haiti |
|
25 |
|
Uzbekistan |
|
24 |
|
Romania |
|
23 |
| Nigeria
|
|
21 |
|
Turkey |
|
21 |
| Zambia
|
|
20 |
|
Paraguay |
|
18 |
| Uruguay
|
|
18 |
|
Lao PDR |
|
17 |
| Iran,
Islamic Rep. |
|
16 |
|
Eritrea |
|
15 |
| Tonga
|
|
15 |
|
Ethiopia |
|
14 |
| Moldova
|
|
14 |
|
Russian Federation |
|
14 |
| Brazil
|
|
13 |
|
Congo, Dem. Rep. |
|
13 |
| Jamaica
|
|
13 |
|
Mozambique |
|
13 |
| Burundi
|
|
12 |
|
Guinea |
|
12 |
| Argentina
|
|
11 |
|
Kenya |
|
11 |
| Malawi
|
|
11 |
|
Tajikistan |
|
10 |
| Uganda
|
|
10 |
|
| |
|
Source: World Bank data files. |
 |
|
|
|

|
|
The sources of
government revenue have been changing.
Taxes on international trade declined
between 1995 and 2003. Taxes on income,
profits, and capital gains and taxes on
goods and services increased during the
same period. High-income economies
depended more on income taxes
(28 percent) compared with low- and
middle-income economies, which derived
32 percent of their revenue from taxes
on goods and services and 8 percent from
taxes on trade (table 4.13).
External debt
continues to increase
In 2003 the external debt of low-
and middle-income economies increased by
$220 billion in nominal terms, about 9
percent of their total debt stock in
2002 (table 4.16). But the external debt
burden measured as the ratio of external
debt to gross national income continued
to decline for all income groups (except
upper middle-income economies) and
regional groups (except Latin America
and the Caribbean). The total debt
burden declined significantly for the
Sub-Saharan African countries, down 11
percentage points to 58 percent in 2003.
The upper middle-income economies saw an
increase of 2 percentage points to 36
percent—Latin America and the Caribbean
saw an increase of 1 percentage point to
47 percent.
The debt servicing burden declined
overall for developing countries by 1
percentage point in 2003. The largest
improvement was for Sub-Saharan Africa,
with a decline of 3 percentage points to
8 percent of the value of exports of
goods and services, income, and workers’
remittances. South Asia saw an increase
of 2 percentage points to 16 percent,
and Latin America and the Caribbean an
increase of 1 percentage point to 31
percent.
Data on the economy—some changes in
reporting methods
Most of the indicators in this
section remain the same as last year.
But there have been some changes in
reporting methods. For the national
accounts the reference year for the
constant price has been changed from
1995 to 2000 in keeping with the
recommended practice in estimating and
reporting national accounts data.
Because rescaling changes the implicit
weights used in forming regional and
income group aggregates, aggregate
growth rates in this year’s World
Development Indicators are not
comparable to those from earlier
editions using different base years (for
details see About the data for table
4.1). Readers interested in comparable
aggregates over a long time period
should consult the World Development
Indicators 2005 CD-ROM or WDI Online,
which contains the revised aggregates by
region and income. Government finance
data in tables 4.11 through 4.13 are now
reported on an accrual basis, as
recommended by the International
Monetary Fund’s (IMF) Government Finance
Manual 2001. Where data on an accrual
basis are not available, the cash basis
data have been recast into the new
framework by IMF staff (see tables 4.11
through 4.13 for details on the
changes).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4e
|
Data initiative |
|
The System of
National Accounts—keeping up with the
21st century |
 |
The last
major revision of the System of
National Accounts, completed in
1993, introduced important
changes in the concepts and
methods used to measure the
economy. The revised accounting
structure includes the
partitioning of the accounts and
further integration of the
balance sheets. New balancing
items have been created. The
scope of transactions to be
included, such as illegal
activities and nonmonetary
flows, has been expanded.
Government capital formation has
been extended to include
expenditures by the military on
structures and equipment. And
there is new treatment for
write-offs of bad debts. Also
noteworthy is the harmonization
with the balance of payments. By
2004, 84 countries and
territories, with 56 percent of
world population and 92 percent
of world GDP, had implemented
the 1993 System of National
Accounts, most of them
high-income economies or
transition economies of Eastern
Europe and the former Soviet
Union, which replaced accounts
based on material product with
the 1993 system. |
 |
| |
Even as work continues on
introducing the 1993 System of
National Accounts in many small
and poor economies still using
earlier and nonstandard
versions, a major review of the
1993 system is getting under
way. As the global economy
grows, the transactions that
must be recorded in the national
accounts grow in kind and
complexity. For example, the
treatment of financial
derivatives, agreements to
repurchase securities, and
employee stock options are up
for review. Long-standing
issues, such as the
capitalization of military
expenditures and the inclusion
of a return to capital in the
estimated value of nonmarket
outputs, are also on the agenda.
|
|
| |
In 2003 the United Nations
Statistical Commission called
for a review of the 1993 System
of National Accounts, stopping
short of calling for fundamental
changes. The commission was
concerned that such a review
could widen the statistical
divide between countries and
compromise international
comparability. Moreover,
comparability with other
macroeconomic frameworks such as
the balance of payments (whose
revision is running in parallel)
and government finance
statistics should be maintained
and improved. Where feasible,
the latest developments in
international business
accounting standards should be
taken into account. |
|
| |
The discussion of issues has to
be brought to a conclusion in a
spirit of consensus, with broad
involvement by all countries.
The review process will focus on
a limited number of carefully
selected issues, while
conserving the conceptual
framework and most of the
recommendations of the 1993
System of National Accounts. So
implementation of the 1993
version should proceed in all
countries and regions while the
updating of the well-specified
issues is in progress. The
update (1993 System of National
Accounts, Rev. 1) is expected to
be ready by 2008. |
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|